So, let’s dive straight into comparing the Nissan Leaf ZE0 and the AZE0, based on my own experiences owning both. First up: power consumption. Now, this is a big one, and honestly, it’s where the AZE0 really shines. I found the ZE0 to be significantly thirstier, especially in colder weather. We’re talking a noticeable difference in kilowatt-hours per mile. I’d regularly see figures around SIXTEEN to EIGHTEEN kilowatt-hours per ONE HUNDRED kilometers in the ZE0, whereas the AZE0 consistently sits around FOURTEEN to SIXTEEN, sometimes even lower if I’m driving really efficiently. That’s a substantial saving, especially when you’re paying for electricity. The improvements in battery technology and the more efficient motor in the AZE0 are clearly noticeable here. It’s not just about the numbers either; it felt like I was constantly topping up the ZE0, whereas the AZE0 gives me a much more relaxed driving experience knowing I can go further on a single charge.
Next, let’s talk power reserve. This is closely linked to range, but it’s about more than just the numbers on the dashboard. With the ZE0, I always felt a bit anxious about range, particularly on longer journeys. The battery degradation was also more noticeable over time. I’d often find myself with less range than the indicated amount, especially as the battery aged. The AZE0, on the other hand, feels much more reliable in this regard. The range is consistently closer to the displayed figure, and I’ve noticed less degradation over a similar period of ownership. It gives me a much greater sense of confidence when planning trips. This peace of mind is invaluable.
Speaking of range, the AZE0 boasts a significantly longer range than the ZE0. We’re talking a difference of at least FIFTY kilometers, maybe even more depending on driving conditions. This is a massive improvement, and it completely changes the practicality of the car. With the ZE0, range anxiety was a real factor, limiting my spontaneous journeys. The AZE0 has largely eliminated that concern. It’s not just about the longer range itself; it’s the impact that has on my daily life and the freedom it provides.
Now, let’s shift gears and talk about dynamics. Both cars are, let’s be honest, not exactly sports cars. But the AZE0 feels noticeably more refined. The steering is slightly more responsive, and the overall driving experience is smoother and quieter. The ZE0, while perfectly adequate for everyday driving, felt a bit more…rough around the edges. The acceleration is comparable, but the AZE0 just feels more polished and less clunky. It’s a subtle difference, but it’s there, and it makes a difference over longer drives.
Finally, let’s touch on the handbrake and charging unit. The handbrake in the ZE0 was…interesting. It felt a bit flimsy and less effective than I’d prefer. The AZE0 has a much improved handbrake, feeling more robust and reliable. As for the charging unit, both cars have their quirks. The ZE0’s charging port felt a bit less refined, and the charging speed was slower compared to the AZE0. The AZE0’s charging system is more efficient and generally a more pleasant experience. These might seem like minor details, but they add up to a more refined and enjoyable overall ownership experience.
So, let’s dive into the charging differences between the ZE0 and AZE0 Leafs. Now, I’ve owned both, and the biggest difference is undeniably the onboard charger. The ZE0, the older model, has a THREE point SIX kilowatt onboard charger. That means it’s a pretty slow poke when it comes to topping up at home. You’re looking at a pretty long time to fully charge, especially if you’ve depleted the battery significantly. We’re talking potentially EIGHT to TEN hours on a standard THREE-PIN socket. The AZE0, on the other hand, boasts a SIX point SIX kilowatt onboard charger. This is a HUGE improvement. It cuts down charging time considerably, getting you back on the road much faster. I’ve found it takes around FIVE to SIX hours on a standard THREE-PIN socket, a significant difference that really impacts daily usability. You’ll notice the difference even more if you’re using a dedicated EV charger, of course. The faster charging speeds with the AZE0 are a game-changer for convenience.
Next up, let’s talk about the handbrake. This is a surprisingly significant difference between the two models. The ZE0 has a traditional handbrake lever, you know, the kind you pull up. It’s simple, straightforward, and something most drivers are familiar with. However, the AZE0 switched to an electronic parking brake. Now, some people love this, and some people hate it. Personally, I found the electronic parking brake in the AZE0 to be a bit… finicky. Sometimes it would engage a little too aggressively, and other times it felt a bit hesitant. The traditional handbrake in the ZE0 was just more reliable and predictable for me. It’s a small thing, but it’s something to consider if you’re sensitive to these kinds of differences.
Now, let’s get into the heater. This is a big one for those of us living in colder climates. Both cars have electric heaters, which is standard for EVs, but the efficiency differs. The ZE0, being the older model, felt noticeably less efficient at heating the cabin, especially on those really frosty mornings. It seemed to draw more power from the battery, impacting the range quite a bit. The AZE0, however, seems to have a more efficient heating system. While it’s still an electric heater, it felt like it used less energy to achieve the same level of cabin warmth. This translates to better range in cold weather, which is a massive plus for winter driving.
Let’s move on to the battery itself. Here’s where things get interesting. The ZE0 had a smaller battery capacity, typically around TWENTY FOUR kilowatt-hours. This resulted in a shorter range, obviously. The AZE0, depending on the trim level, offered a larger battery, often around THIRTY kilowatt-hours. This translates to a noticeable increase in range, making longer journeys more feasible. However, keep in mind that real-world range always depends on driving style, weather conditions, and other factors. But the increased capacity in the AZE0 is a significant advantage.
- Читайте также:
Finally, let’s talk about CHAdeMO charging times. Both the ZE0 and AZE0 utilize the CHAdeMO fast-charging standard. However, the charging speeds can vary depending on the charger’s output and the battery’s state of charge. Generally speaking, I found the AZE0 to charge slightly faster on CHAdeMO, but the difference wasn’t as dramatic as the difference in onboard charging times. You’re still looking at a significant improvement over home charging, but the difference between the two models wasn’t a deal breaker for me in this area. Both charged relatively quickly on a decent CHAdeMO station.
